Proponents cite the Apostle Paul’s well-known remarks at 1 Corinthians 3:16-17, 6:19. One way to be introspective here is to consider whether you were already against the vaccine before you learned about the abortion nexus. I want to ask you to re-ask that same question again―does this distant abortion connection really outrage you, or is it just a “get out of jail free” card you’re willing to use? Please think very carefully before answering this question. Perhaps you have a more sophisticated form of this objection. As Michael Bird would say, “sweet mother of Melchisedec!”īut, this woman isn’t you. Instead, she did independent study and looked up “sources online.” She then quotes 2 Corinthians 7 out of context and assumes a vaccine will “contaminate” her. Back to the New York Times article―note that this woman fronts her remarks with a discussion of “freedom.” Also, notice that she apparently didn’t consult her faith community about the veracity of her religious objection. The Louisiana Attorney General provides a sample exemption letter with an identical objection. She quoted a passage from the New Testament: “Let us purify ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit.” Some vaccines were developed using fetal cell lines from aborted fetuses, she wrote, citing a remote connection to a practice she finds abhorrent. In August, she submitted an exemption request she wrote herself, bolstered by her own Bible study and language from sources online. My freedom and my children’s freedom and children’s children’s freedom are at stake,” said Ms. Here is a representative example from a professing Christian, quoted in the New York Times: Still, some Christians find this horrifying. Various news outlets explain this connection is distant and far removed, and that the vaccines themselves don’t contain fetal tissue. Some Christians claim the various COVID vaccines have a connection to abortion. This is perhaps the strongest religious exemption of the lot. Now, to the religious justifications themselves. But ask yourself, “Is really why I don’t want the vaccine, or is a convenient pass for me to avoid something I just don’t want to do?” If the answer is yes, then you’re in danger of violating the Third Commandment.Īs a well-known news anchor once said, that’s “kind of a big deal.” You don’t want to do that. You may object and cite an abortion connection, freedom of conscience, and the like. If you’re using God as a free pass to escape a vaccine mandate, then you’re violating the Third Commandment. You must think carefully, very carefully, about why you object to the vaccine. Now we come to religious exemptions for vaccines. This is a violation of the Third Commandment. Look anywhere, and you’ll find professing Christians using God as justification for their unholy ways. To justify divorce in unwarranted circumstances, sexual immorality, sexual confusion, gender identity, and the like. People misuse God’s name for all sorts of sins. I want to do something, so I use God as a blank check, and I get my free pass. One way we do this is when we invoke God as an authority to justify something we want to do. The Third Commandment tells us we must not misuse God’s name (Ex 20:7 Deut 5:11). What should Christians think about them? I’ll provide one over-arching principle, then briefly discuss some common religious justifications we see offered up. Vaccine mandates have arrived, and so have questions about religious exemptions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |